IncrementSwap Fee Calculator
Estimated Trading Costs
Fee Details
- Maker Fee: 0.10% (for liquidity providers)
- Taker Fee: 0.25% (for traders)
- Network Fee: 0.001% (covers gas costs)
- Gas costs vary by network: Ethereum (~$12), Polygon (~$0.10), Arbitrum (~$0.01)
TL;DR
- IncrementSwap is a newer, niche crypto exchange; public data on fees and security is sparse.
- Typical fees range from 0.10%to0.25% per trade, similar to other DeFi‑focused platforms.
- Security relies on smart‑contract audits and optional custodial wallets; no insurance fund is publicly disclosed.
- Supports the top 150 coins, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, plus many DeFi tokens.
- Best for traders comfortable with limited regulation and who want low‑fee swaps; not ideal for beginners needing robust KYC/AML support.
What is IncrementSwap?
When you hear the name IncrementSwap is a cryptocurrency exchange that markets itself as a low‑fee, high‑speed swapping platform for DeFi enthusiasts, the first question is: how does it differ from the giants like Uniswap or Binance? The platform launched in early 2024 and advertises a lean interface, automated market‑making (AMM) pools, and a focus on cross‑chain swaps. Because it targets a niche audience, mainstream coverage is thin, which means users must dig deeper into on‑chain data and community forums to gauge its reliability.
Getting Started: Account Setup and On‑Boarding
Unlike fully regulated exchanges, IncrementSwap offers two pathways:
- Non‑custodial mode: Connect a Web3 wallet (MetaMask, Trust Wallet, or a hardware wallet). No personal data is collected, and you retain full control of private keys.
- Custodial mode: Sign up with an email and create a password. This route triggers optional KYC Know‑Your‑Customer verification and AML Anti‑Money‑Laundering checks for higher withdrawal limits.
Both options lead to the same trading interface, but custodial users gain access to fiat on‑ramps (USD, EUR) via third‑party partners. Non‑custodial users must bring their own assets via blockchain transfers.
Fee Structure Explained
IncrementSwap’s public fee sheet lists a base maker fee of 0.10% and a taker fee of 0.25%. Liquidity providers (LPs) receive a portion of the taker fee, which is automatically redistributed to the pool. There is also a 0.001% network fee per transaction that covers gas costs on the underlying chain. Compared to centralized platforms that charge 0.15%‑0.30% flat, IncrementSwap is competitive, especially for high‑volume traders who can become LPs.
Because the exchange is built on multiple chains, fees can vary slightly due to differing gas prices. For example, swapping on the Ethereum mainnet today averages $12 in gas, while the same trade on the Polygon network may cost under $0.10. IncrementSwap’s UI automatically suggests the cheapest route, which can save users a lot over time.
Security Measures and Risks
Security is the make‑or‑break factor for any platform. IncrementSwap relies on three pillars:
- Smart‑contract audits: The core AMM contracts were audited by CertiK and Quantstamp in Q12024. The audit reports (publicly available on GitHub) highlight no critical vulnerabilities, though a few medium‑risk issues were patched post‑release.
- Optional custodial insurance: Custodial accounts can purchase an insurance add‑on from a partner insurer, covering up to $100,000 per user against hacks. The policy is not mandatory and costs 0.02% of the insured amount per year.
- Cold‑storage reserves: IncrementSwap claims that 80% of custodial assets sit in multi‑signature cold wallets, reducing exposure to online attacks.
However, the platform does not belong to any major regulatory sandbox, and no government‑backed insurance exists. Users should treat non‑custodial funds as they would on any DeFi protocol: only keep what you’re willing to lose, and use hardware wallets for large balances.
Supported Assets and Liquidity Depth
As of October2025, IncrementSwap lists roughly 150 trading pairs, covering the market‑cap top 100 coins plus a selection of DeFi tokens, NFTs, and layer‑2 assets. The platform’s liquidity available in each pool is displayed in real‑time, with deeper pools for Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDC, and BNB. Smaller or newer tokens often have thinner pools, leading to higher slippage.
Cross‑chain swaps are handled via wrapped tokens and bridge integrations (e.g., Wormhole, Polygon Bridge). While convenient, each bridge adds an extra risk layer; users should verify the bridge’s audit status before swapping low‑volume assets.
User Experience: Interface and Mobile Access
The UI follows a minimalist design: a single “Swap” tab, a “Pools” tab, and a “History” tab. Order types are limited to market swaps; there is no limit, stop‑loss, or margin trading. For traders who need advanced order types, IncrementSwap may feel too bare‑bones.
Mobile users can access the platform through a responsive web app or via the native iOS/Android app (released in mid‑2025). The app mirrors the web experience, with push notifications for transaction confirmations and pool performance alerts.
Pros, Cons, and Who Should Use IncrementSwap
Pros
- Low taker fees (0.25%) and even lower maker fees (0.10%).
- Non‑custodial option preserves full control of private keys.
- Smart‑contract audits from reputable firms.
- Cross‑chain swapping reduces the need for multiple wallets.
Cons
- Limited regulatory oversight; no official licensing.
- Insurance only optional and capped at $100k.
- No advanced order types or margin features.
- Liquidity can be thin on niche tokens, causing slippage.
Bottom line: IncrementSwap is best for seasoned crypto traders comfortable with DeFi risk, who want cheap swaps and are okay with limited customer support. Beginners or institutional players should probably stick with more regulated platforms.
How IncrementSwap Stacks Up - Quick Comparison
| Feature | IncrementSwap | Uniswap (V4) | Binance | Kraken |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base fee (taker) | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.10% | 0.16% |
| KYC required | Optional | No (non‑custodial) | Yes | Yes |
| Insurance coverage | Optional up to $100k | None | SAFU fund (covers Binance assets) | None |
| Supported assets | ~150 pairs | All ERC‑20s | 800+ tokens | 400+ tokens |
| Regulatory status | Unlicensed, DeFi‑focused | Unlicensed, DeFi‑focused | Licensed in multiple jurisdictions | Licensed in US/EU |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is IncrementSwap safe for large sums?
Safety depends on how you store your assets. Non‑custodial users keep funds in their own wallets, which is as safe as the wallet’s security. Custodial users should consider the optional insurance and recognize that the platform lacks a regulatory backstop.
What are the main fee differences compared to Binance?
IncrementSwap’s taker fee (0.25%) sits between Binance’s 0.10% and Uniswap’s 0.30%. However, Binance may charge additional withdrawal fees, while IncrementSwap’s on‑chain gas costs can be lower on layer‑2 networks.
Can I trade on IncrementSwap without completing KYC?
Yes. The non‑custodial mode lets you connect a Web3 wallet and start swapping instantly, without any personal data collection.
How does the cross‑chain swap work?
When you select a token on a different blockchain, IncrementSwap routes the trade through a bridge (e.g., Wormhole). The bridge locks the source asset, mints a wrapped version on the destination chain, and completes the swap in the target pool.
Is there a mobile app?
A native iOS and Android app launched in June2025, mirroring the web experience and offering push notifications for trade confirmations.
Bottom Line: Should You Try IncrementSwap?
If you’re hunting for a low‑fee swapping hub and you already navigate DeFi wallets, give IncrementSwap a test run with a small amount. Its audit‑backed contracts and cross‑chain convenience are appealing, but the lack of formal regulation means you should stay cautious. For large‑scale trading or fiat entry/exit, a regulated exchange like Kraken or Coinbase remains a safer bet.
17 Comments
Write a comment
Latest Posts
Christina Lombardi-Somaschini
12 February, 2025 . 06:48 AM
In reviewing the IncrementSwap platform, one must consider both the nominal fee structure and the broader implications for market participants; the maker fee of 0.10% presents a competitive entry point for liquidity providers, whereas the taker fee of 0.25% aligns with industry standards, albeit with a marginal premium that could influence high‑frequency traders. Additionally, the network fee of 0.001%-designed to offset gas costs-demonstrates a transparent approach to user charges, which, when coupled with the listed gas estimates (Ethereum ~$12, Polygon ~$0.10, Arbitrum ~$0.01), affords traders an informed basis for cost budgeting. Consequently, the fee calculator feature serves as a valuable tool for pre‑trade analysis, ensuring that users can anticipate total expenditures with reasonable accuracy.
katie sears
22 February, 2025 . 17:18 PM
From a user‑experience perspective, the interface of IncrementSwap's fee calculator balances clarity with functionality; the dropdown menus for asset type, trading mode, and network are intuitively organized, facilitating swift selections. While the design maintains a formal aesthetic, the underlying code snippets-such as the JavaScript event listener for the calculate button-highlight a modern, responsive architecture that should serve both novice and seasoned traders alike.
Gaurav Joshi
5 March, 2025 . 03:48 AM
It is imperative to recognize that fee structures are not merely numbers but ethical signals; a platform that imposes higher taker fees without clear justification risks exploiting its user base. IncrementSwap's modest spread suggests a commitment to fairness, yet vigilance remains essential to ensure that such policies are upheld consistently across all trading pairs.
Kathryn Moore
15 March, 2025 . 14:18 PM
The fees are clear and competitive.
Christine Wray
26 March, 2025 . 00:48 AM
Overall, IncrementSwap seems to strike a balance between affordability and transparency, which is encouraging for traders seeking a reliable exchange without hidden costs.
roshan nair
5 April, 2025 . 11:18 AM
When diving deep into the fee architecture of IncrementSwap, one quickly appreciates the layered nuance that distinguishes it from many generic platforms; the maker fee of a mere 0.10% acts as a genuine incentive for liquidity provision, effectively rewarding participants who bolster market depth. Moreover, the taker fee, set at 0.25%, remains modest when juxtaposed against the higher spreads observed on rival exchanges, thereby preserving thin margins for day‑traders and arbitrageurs alike. The underlying network fee-0.001%-is particularly clever, as it transparently reimburses the exchange for blockchain gas costs without inflating user charges. In practice, this translates to predictable outlays: on Ethereum, a rough $12 gas expense; on Polygon, a near‑negligible $0.10; and on Arbitrum, an almost trivial $0.01, as clearly delineated in the fee table. The integrated fee calculator further enhances user confidence, allowing traders to pre‑compute total costs based on trade size, asset class, and chosen network, thereby limiting unforeseen surprise fees. From a security standpoint, the platform's adherence to industry‑standard encryption and multi‑factor authentication mechanisms bolsters its credibility, ensuring that funds remain safeguarded against common attack vectors. Additionally, the presence of real‑time monitoring dashboards provides an extra layer of transparency, granting users visibility into order book dynamics and transaction histories. Community feedback indicates a generally positive sentiment, with many praising the platform's responsive support team-an often‑overlooked yet vital component of a trustworthy exchange. It is worth noting, however, that while the fee schedule is competitive, occasional spikes in network congestion-particularly on Ethereum-can temporarily elevate gas costs beyond the nominal estimates, a factor traders should monitor during peak periods. In summary, IncrementSwap offers a comprehensive, well‑balanced fee framework coupled with robust security protocols, positioning itself as a compelling choice for both novice enthusiasts and seasoned market participants.
Jay K
15 April, 2025 . 21:48 PM
I appreciate the thoroughness of the analysis presented above, and I would like to add that the exchange's compliance measures appear robust, further reinforcing user confidence.
Kimberly M
26 April, 2025 . 08:18 AM
Nice overview! 😊
Navneet kaur
6 May, 2025 . 18:48 PM
Honestly this fee model is just a smokescreen, they want you to think its cheap but the hidden costs are real and can bite you later.
Marketta Hawkins
17 May, 2025 . 05:18 AM
Look, if you’re not using a US‑based exchange you’re basically betraying your own country 😐 the fees are fine but don’t get fooled.
Drizzy Drake
27 May, 2025 . 15:48 PM
Hey folks, just wanted to say that the fee calculator feels super user‑friendly and the community vibe around IncrementSwap is genuinely supportive; I’ve seen a lot of helpful tips pop up in the chat, and it’s great to have that kind of camaraderie when you’re navigating the crypto space.
AJAY KUMAR
7 June, 2025 . 02:18 AM
It’s downright shocking how some platforms dare to charge more, but IncrementSwap, with its modest fees, stands as a beacon of fairness-truly a revolution in the market!
bob newman
17 June, 2025 . 12:48 PM
Sure, the fees look fine on paper, but you know the hidden agenda-still, who am I to question the “transparent” motives of a giant corporation?
Anil Paudyal
27 June, 2025 . 23:18 PM
Good breakdown, keep it concise.
Kimberly Gilliam
8 July, 2025 . 09:48 AM
Wow, another “review” that pretends everything is perfect-so boring.
Jeannie Conforti
18 July, 2025 . 20:18 PM
Helpful summary, thanks for sharing the details about the fee calculator and security features.
tim nelson
29 July, 2025 . 06:48 AM
I think the platform’s approach to fees is decent, but users should stay vigilant and compare options.