Use this tool to evaluate HKD.com against leading exchanges based on key criteria important to traders.
HKD.com's fee range includes a 0.02% flat fee that is competitive with mid-tier exchanges.
HKD.com requires full trust in the exchange for asset safety.
Lack of licensing poses legal and security risks for users.
User feedback indicates HKD.com suffers from poor reliability and trust issues.
For traders prioritizing security, compliance, and reliability, HKD.com presents significant risks compared to regulated exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken.
This tool provides a comparative overview based on publicly available data. Cryptocurrency trading involves substantial risk. Always do your own research before making investment decisions.
Looking for an honest, up‑to‑date assessment of HKD.com crypto exchange review? This article breaks down the exchange’s features, fee structure, security model, regulatory status and real‑world user experience, then pits it against the market leaders so you can decide whether it belongs in your portfolio.
HKD.com is a Hong Kong‑based cryptocurrency exchange launched in 2019 under HKD.COM LIMITED. The company operates a 10,000‑square‑foot physical trading store in Hong Kong’s central business district and claims to handle over $1billion in daily trading volume. The platform targets retail and institutional traders with a suite of services ranging from basic spot trading to derivatives, NFTs, yield‑earning programs and token launchpads.
Fee information is contradictory. FxVerify lists a “0.00% maker and taker” policy, while a GitHub analysis shows a 0.02% flat fee, which aligns with most mid‑tier exchanges. Below is a snapshot of the most commonly cited rates:
Exchange | Maker Fee | Taker Fee | VIP Discounts | Additional Costs |
---|---|---|---|---|
HKD.com | 0.00% - 0.02% | 0.00% - 0.02% | Up to 30% on high‑volume accounts | Withdrawal fees vary by coin |
Binance | 0.01% | 0.01% | 25% discount with BNB holdings | Low network fees |
Coinbase | 0.00% (maker) | 0.50% - 0.60% | Fee tiered by monthly volume | Higher fiat conversion fees |
Kraken | 0.00% - 0.16% | 0.10% - 0.26% | Tiered discounts, no native token | Standard network fees |
Even at the low‑end of the range, HKD.com does not beat Binance’s 0.01% maker/taker fee when factoring in the indirect cost of a potentially unreliable platform.
The exchange uses a fully custodial wallet system. Users’ private keys are stored in HKD.com’s hot and cold wallets, protected by multi‑signature controls. While the company touts “cutting‑edge encryption”, the custodial nature means you must trust HKD.com completely for asset safety.
For contrast, platforms like Binance and Kraken offer optional self‑custody on hardware wallets, and Coinbase provides a non‑custodial “Coinbase Wallet” that hands control back to the user.
According to FxVerify, HKD.com is not registered with any financial regulator, neither the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) nor overseas bodies such as the FCA or SEC. This lack of licence exposes users to legal uncertainty, especially in jurisdictions that forbid unregistered crypto services.
By comparison, Binance has secured licences in multiple regions, Coinbase is a registered broker‑dealer in the U.S., and Kraken holds a European crypto‑asset licence. The regulatory gap for HKD.com is a red flag for risk‑averse traders.
App‑store reviews paint a troubling picture:
These complaints line up with web‑traffic data from SimilarWeb: only 2,742 monthly visits, a 39% bounce rate, and an average session length of just 10.6seconds. Low engagement suggests users either cannot access services or leave quickly due to distrust.
FxVerify ranks HKD.com at 420/612 in organic traffic, far behind industry leaders. Daily trading volume claims of $1billion remain unverified; independent sources often list Binance, Coinbase and Kraken with volumes 10‑20× higher.
The physical trading store is a unique marketing hook, but it does little to offset the platform’s digital shortcomings. In a market where regulation, liquidity and reliability dominate, HKD.com currently sits on the periphery.
If you prioritize security, regulatory compliance and reliable withdrawals, HKD.com falls short. The platform’s feature set looks attractive on paper, but real‑world performance, user feedback and the lack of oversight make it a high‑risk choice. For casual traders who can afford to lock funds temporarily, the low‑fee promise might be tempting, yet the potential for frozen assets outweighs the modest savings.
Most seasoned users will be safer on regulated, high‑liquidity exchanges such as Binance, Coinbase or Kraken. Keep HKD.com on a watchlist only if the company obtains a clear licence and resolves its withdrawal bottlenecks.
No. Current public records show HKD.com is not licensed by the HongKong Securities and Futures Commission or any other major regulator, which raises legal and security concerns.
Published rates vary between 0.00% and 0.02% for both maker and taker trades. The lower figure is promotional; the most reliable source cites a flat 0.02% fee.
Users have reported withdrawals being delayed from days to over a year, often pending “financial verification”. There is no guarantee of instant withdrawal.
Android users rate the app 3.8/5, but many cite login errors and network glitches. The iOS version received a recent update (v3.1.2) that attempts to fix known bugs, yet withdrawal complaints persist.
HKD.com offers a similar variety of assets but lags in liquidity, regulation, and reliability. Binance and Coinbase provide higher volumes, robust regulatory frameworks, and more consistent withdrawal performance, albeit at higher fees in some cases.
Zack Mast
14 October, 2024 . 01:03 AM
In the shadows of trade, even zero‑fee promises whisper of unseen chains.
Dale Breithaupt
15 October, 2024 . 18:43 PM
If you’re hunting low fees, remember the real cost is often hidden in withdrawal delays.
Rasean Bryant
17 October, 2024 . 12:23 PM
Good news: the platform’s wide pair selection could be a nice playground for new traders, just stay alert.
Angie Food
19 October, 2024 . 06:03 AM
Wow, another “groundbreaking” exchange that thinks it can out‑shine the giants, huh?
First off, the so‑called “zero fees” are about as real as unicorns in a stock market.
They brag about 0.00‑0.02% maker‑taker, but then slip in hidden withdrawal fees that bite you harder than a midnight shark.
And let’s not ignore the fact that they’re completely unregulated-like a gambling den with no bouncer.
Custodial wallets? Yeah, hand over your private keys and pray the vault doesn’t magically explode.
User reviews scream about login failures; I’ve seen more reliable coffee machines than this site.
Withdrawal delays? Oh, you mean the endless “pending verification” loop that feels like waiting for a snail to finish a marathon.
Their physical store in Hong Kong is probably just a fancy showroom to distract from the digital mess.
Liquidity? Don’t make me laugh; you’ll get slippage faster than you can say “market order.”
Security‑model hype is just a marketing buzzword; without proper licensing, you’re basically handing your money to a stranger.
Even the VIP discount program feels like a cruel joke-‘You get a discount, but you might never actually withdraw your funds.’
I’ve seen better uptime from a dial‑up connection in the 90s.
If you’re thinking about using HKD.com, consider whether you enjoy living on the edge of financial roulette.
Honestly, the platform’s risk rating should be a flashing red alert, not a subtle “high risk” badge.
Bottom line: stay far, stay safe, and keep your crypto where you control the keys.
Jonathan Tsilimos
20 October, 2024 . 23:43 PM
From a compliance perspective, the absence of regulatory oversight coupled with a fully custodial architecture fundamentally undermines risk mitigation protocols and escalates counterparty exposure.
jeffrey najar
22 October, 2024 . 17:23 PM
When you’re dealing with a custodial exchange like this, always keep a portion of your holdings in a non‑custodial wallet; it’s the simplest insurance against platform hiccups.
Rochelle Gamauf
24 October, 2024 . 11:03 AM
The presented fee structure, while ostensibly competitive, suffers from a lack of transparency that betrays a superficial adherence to market standards.
Jerry Cassandro
27 October, 2024 . 08:30 AM
A quick tip: double‑check the network fee schedule for each coin before you initiate a withdrawal, as these can vary dramatically and affect your net return.
Parker DeWitt
29 October, 2024 . 02:10 AM
Yeah, those hidden fees can really bite 😅! Keep an eye on them and you’ll avoid nasty surprises.
Allie Smith
30 October, 2024 . 19:50 PM
Even with the red flags, some folks find the diverse token list fun, as long as they treat it like a sandbox rather than a bank.
Lexie Ludens
1 November, 2024 . 13:30 PM
Oh, the tragedy of trusting strangers with your digital gold! It feels like watching a drama where the hero is betrayed by the very walls meant to protect him.
Aaron Casey
3 November, 2024 . 07:10 AM
In terms of systemic risk, the custodial key‑management architecture introduces a single‑point failure vector that escalates operational risk metrics.
Leah Whitney
5 November, 2024 . 00:50 AM
If you decide to give it a try, start with a modest amount and monitor the withdrawal pipeline; that way you can gauge reliability without risking everything.
Lisa Stark
6 November, 2024 . 18:30 PM
One might reflect that the allure of convenience often blinds us to the deeper principle of ownership and autonomy in the crypto realm.
Logan Cates
8 November, 2024 . 12:10 PM
I’ve heard whispers that the exchange’s back‑end runs on servers hidden in a bunker, and that the delays are part of a larger scheme to control the market.
Shelley Arenson
10 November, 2024 . 05:50 AM
Sounds like a wild ride 🚀, but maybe stick with the big guys for peace of mind!
Joel Poncz
11 November, 2024 . 23:30 PM
i get it, the hype can be real tempting but dont lose sleep over it.
Kris Roberts
13 November, 2024 . 17:10 PM
Seeing all these reports, it’s clear that community trust is the real currency here, more than any token price.
lalit g
15 November, 2024 . 10:50 AM
While the platform offers unique services, it’s wise to weigh them against the proven stability of regulated exchanges before committing funds.
Reid Priddy
17 November, 2024 . 04:30 AM
One could argue that the lack of licensing is a red flag, yet the community still drifts toward it, perhaps out of curiosity rather than confidence.
Shamalama Dee
18 November, 2024 . 22:10 PM
My advice: diversify your holdings across multiple exchanges and keep the bulk in a hardware wallet you control.
scott bell
20 November, 2024 . 15:50 PM
Imagine the thrill of exploring a new exchange, only to discover the hidden labyrinth of verification that drains patience and assets-such is the odyssey of modern trading.
vincent gaytano
22 November, 2024 . 09:30 AM
Sure, because nothing says “secure investment” like trusting an unlicensed platform with your crypto while waiting forever for a withdrawal.